Follow Us: facebook instagram messenger linkedin twitter tiktok youtube
USC PUBLISHING HOUSE

AI Tools Usage Guidelines

 


SECTION 1. PURPOSE
The guidelines of AI Tools use for any publication or publishing processes shall determine the rationale of AI use in publication and enforce the ethical and responsible application of any type of AI software. Further, the provisions of these guidelines. Furthermore, this document describes the scope within which authors, reviewers, and editors are guided by the specific journal’s workflow

SECTION 2. DEFINITION OF AI TOOLS
Each type of AI tool has corresponding tasks and applied based on the author/s needs in the preparation of the manuscript. This document identifies two software, namely (a) Assistive AI Tools and (b) Generative AI Tools.

Assistive AI Tools. These are AI software programs or applications with features that can help users enhance, refine, and improve the quality of language output (i.e. grammar, spelling, punctuation), summarize large volume of written material and assist in simple to complex computing and mathematical operations (i.e statistical functions, data management). The tools may also include fundamental and elaborate research tasks and deep analysis of data from research database. Furthermore, users utilize this tool when navigating and brainstorming or making sense of interconnected ideas. Typical examples of this type are grammar checkers, sentence parsers, and citation managers.

Generative AI Tools. These are AI software programs or applications that use human prompts in order to create images, graphs, infographics, icons; or build structural concepts and abstract forms based on syntax suggested by instructions transmitted by a human user. Examples of this type are ChatGPT, DALL-E, Claude and LLMs.

SECTION 3. ACCEPTABLE USE OF AI BY AUTHORS
Acknowledging the assistive function and operational convenience brought by AI Tools, especially in substantive writing workload, the authors are permitted to utilize routine functions such as grammar/style enhancement, formatting and citation checking, translating, summarizing, language editing and word count checking. Moreover, nonroutine functions such as generating table, chart, and graph using AI are also allowed provided that the AI Tool used in the process is cited in accordance with AI Tool citation conventions of the specific journal (i.e. MLA, APA, CHICAGO).

It must be noted that an AI Tool is a non-legal entity and therefore must not be listed as author or co-author. The author/s assume responsibility of any assets created through or by the AI Tool in terms of accuracy, correctness, validity and sensitivity of the corresponding information, including ethical compliance

SECTION 4. DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
The authors must disclose the use of AI by providing the following details in the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use Declaration Form — (a) name of AI Tool, (b) purpose of use (c) sections of the text where AI was involved or applied, and (d) the extent of use, gauged in three levels: minimal, moderate, and heavy.

SECTION 5. LIMITATIONS AND PROHIBITED USES
Data fabrication and any type of unethical data creation, fake references, and literature are prohibited. In addition, excessive or heavy-AI content generation (i.e. making an entire manuscript from AI Tool) is forbidden. A human oversight should always be upheld to vet the AI content. The AI tool shall not be considered a proxy for a peer-reviewer and must not be used for critical analysis and evaluation of data or researched materials. Furthermore, the authors should be cautious in using AI tool to probe confidential materials and unpublished documents in view of the data ingestion. Finally, the author/s must not use AI tool to plagiarize, and in turn must be wary against AI hallucination

SECTION 6. GUIDELINES FOR REVIEWERS
The peer reviewers are bound by ethical parameters in handling the manuscript by not uploading it to AI programs or using such to generate a full peer-review report. The use of AI tool for automatic screening of critical components such as ethical implications where the AI program performs a substantive decision-making over risks without human vetting is prohibited. AI tool must ideally be used for routine tasks like grammar check and rephrasing, however, the process should be done with careful vetting.

SECTION 7. GUIDELINES FOR EDITORS
Editors may utilize AI Tools to manage administrative tasks (i.e. shortlisting reviewers, refining editorial letters, assisting in communication tasks). Further, AI Tools can be used by editors for manuscript management in case the USC Publishing House Manuscript Management System is not available. However, editors are prohibited from excessively producing AI-generated content where majority of their editorial report and decisions are made by AI.

SECTION 8. ETHICAL AND LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS
In terms of data privacy, the authors, reviewers, and editors should be circumvent in feeding discreet information to AI programs, due to the tendency of the latter to collect and store data and metadata in third-party servers. The same caution is advised in uploading materials (to AI servers) that are covered by Intellectual Property (IP) and Data Privacy Law. A thorough review and validation of AI-generated content is important to address possible copyright infringement, recognizing that some AI assets like images may be based on copyrighted artworks and styles.

SECTION 9. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONSEQUENCES
In case the author failed to properly disclose the use of AI, and their work/s has/have been found in violation of the ethical use of AI Tools, the EIC reserves the right to reject or retract the material, if already published. On the other hand, reviewers who failed to observe responsible use of AI will be removed from the pool of reviewers maintained by the journal. Prior to any sanction, a thorough investigation and assessment of the violation will be done; and in such process, proper documentation and a detailed report to the editorial board and USC Publishing House Management will be prepared by the EIC of the journal. This report will be used as a basis for strengthening future compliance.




CONTACT US


FOLLOW US ON OUR SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS facebook instagram messenger linkedin twitter tiktok youtube
publishing.usc.edu.ph
(032) 230 0100 Ext. 290
Business Manager: uscpublishinghouse@usc.edu.ph
Secretary: publishinghouse@usc.edu.ph
   USC Publishing House
Nasipit, Talamban, Cebu City 6000