SECTION 1. PURPOSE
The guidelines of AI Tools use for any publication or publishing processes shall determine
the rationale of AI use in publication and enforce the ethical and responsible application
of any type of AI software. Further, the provisions of these guidelines. Furthermore, this
document describes the scope within which authors, reviewers, and editors are guided by
the specific journal’s workflow
SECTION 2. DEFINITION OF AI TOOLS
Each type of AI tool has corresponding tasks and applied based on the author/s needs in
the preparation of the manuscript. This document identifies two software, namely (a)
Assistive AI Tools and (b) Generative AI Tools.
Assistive AI Tools. These are AI software programs or applications with features
that can help users enhance, refine, and improve the quality of language output (i.e.
grammar, spelling, punctuation), summarize large volume of written material and
assist in simple to complex computing and mathematical operations (i.e statistical
functions, data management). The tools may also include fundamental and elaborate
research tasks and deep analysis of data from research database. Furthermore,
users utilize this tool when navigating and brainstorming or making sense of
interconnected ideas. Typical examples of this type are grammar checkers, sentence
parsers, and citation managers.
Generative AI Tools. These are AI software programs or applications that use
human prompts in order to create images, graphs, infographics, icons; or build
structural concepts and abstract forms based on syntax suggested by instructions
transmitted by a human user. Examples of this type are ChatGPT, DALL-E, Claude
and LLMs.
SECTION 3. ACCEPTABLE USE OF AI BY AUTHORS
Acknowledging the assistive function and operational convenience brought by AI Tools,
especially in substantive writing workload, the authors are permitted to utilize routine
functions such as grammar/style enhancement, formatting and citation checking,
translating, summarizing, language editing and word count checking. Moreover, nonroutine functions such as generating table, chart, and graph using AI are also allowed
provided that the AI Tool used in the process is cited in accordance with AI Tool citation
conventions of the specific journal (i.e. MLA, APA, CHICAGO).
It must be noted that an AI Tool is a non-legal entity and therefore must not be listed as
author or co-author. The author/s assume responsibility of any assets created through or
by the AI Tool in terms of accuracy, correctness, validity and sensitivity of the
corresponding information, including ethical compliance
SECTION 4. DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
The authors must disclose the use of AI by providing the following details in the Artificial
Intelligence (AI) Use Declaration Form — (a) name of AI Tool, (b) purpose of use (c)
sections of the text where AI was involved or applied, and (d) the extent of use, gauged
in three levels: minimal, moderate, and heavy.
SECTION 5. LIMITATIONS AND PROHIBITED USES
Data fabrication and any type of unethical data creation, fake references, and literature
are prohibited. In addition, excessive or heavy-AI content generation (i.e. making an entire
manuscript from AI Tool) is forbidden. A human oversight should always be upheld to vet
the AI content. The AI tool shall not be considered a proxy for a peer-reviewer and must
not be used for critical analysis and evaluation of data or researched materials.
Furthermore, the authors should be cautious in using AI tool to probe confidential
materials and unpublished documents in view of the data ingestion. Finally, the author/s
must not use AI tool to plagiarize, and in turn must be wary against AI hallucination
SECTION 6. GUIDELINES FOR REVIEWERS
The peer reviewers are bound by ethical parameters in handling the manuscript by not
uploading it to AI programs or using such to generate a full peer-review report. The use
of AI tool for automatic screening of critical components such as ethical implications where
the AI program performs a substantive decision-making over risks without human vetting
is prohibited. AI tool must ideally be used for routine tasks like grammar check and
rephrasing, however, the process should be done with careful vetting.
SECTION 7. GUIDELINES FOR EDITORS
Editors may utilize AI Tools to manage administrative tasks (i.e. shortlisting reviewers,
refining editorial letters, assisting in communication tasks). Further, AI Tools can be used
by editors for manuscript management in case the USC Publishing House Manuscript
Management System is not available. However, editors are prohibited from excessively
producing AI-generated content where majority of their editorial report and decisions are
made by AI.
SECTION 8. ETHICAL AND LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS
In terms of data privacy, the authors, reviewers, and editors should be circumvent in
feeding discreet information to AI programs, due to the tendency of the latter to collect
and store data and metadata in third-party servers. The same caution is advised in
uploading materials (to AI servers) that are covered by Intellectual Property (IP) and Data
Privacy Law. A thorough review and validation of AI-generated content is important to
address possible copyright infringement, recognizing that some AI assets like images may
be based on copyrighted artworks and styles.
SECTION 9. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONSEQUENCES
In case the author failed to properly disclose the use of AI, and their work/s has/have been
found in violation of the ethical use of AI Tools, the EIC reserves the right to reject or
retract the material, if already published. On the other hand, reviewers who failed to
observe responsible use of AI will be removed from the pool of reviewers maintained by
the journal. Prior to any sanction, a thorough investigation and assessment of the violation
will be done; and in such process, proper documentation and a detailed report to the
editorial board and USC Publishing House Management will be prepared by the
EIC of the journal. This report will be used as a basis for strengthening future
compliance.